The More Things Change, The More They Stay the Same

A friend of mine sent me this video the other day (mainly for it’s similarities to this comedic gem). It’s the intro to a French TV documentary about the city of Los Angeles, and it perfectly relates a number of the problems inherent in sprawl based development. The only problem is, this is a film from 1969. Here we are 43 years later, not only still facing these same problems (sprawling development, auto dependence, alienation from our neighbors, class segregation), but in most cases, still only marginally aware (at best) that there are any problems.


http://youtu.be/7-R1b2Tz9fY

“The people of Los Angeles love to think that they live in the city of the future, but it is rather a city of the present incarnation of past times, and as a consequence, the very thing that unknowingly empties our cities once the outskirts begin to grow. If you would like to know what the outskirts of Paris, London, or even Moscow will soon look like, what their problems will be, what is waiting for us, threatening us, you must go to Los Angeles.”

Ouch.

Cycling in NYC

Here’s a brief piece by Lizzie Widdicombe that appeared in the Sept 3, 2012 edition of the New Yorker about a morning in the life of a New York City bicycle messenger. It has some great descriptions of the dangers involved in riding a bike around the largest city in the country. While the profession of bike messenger has been on the wane, the rising cost of oil over the next few decades will most likely make it more common, cost-effective and respectable again.

Article (PDF) – Unfortunately the New Yorker doesn’t keep stuff on their site unless you’re a subscriber.

Design for People, Not Awards

Another interesting TED Talk by Timothy Prestero. While he’s talking about the medical devices that he’s been involved in the process of developing, it’s not much of a stretch at all to extend this principle to the built environment: design with people in mind, not awards or accolades for innovation. In the end, it’s people who will have to use and inhabit the built environment, therefore it makes sense for those environments to be habitable and useful. As you watch the video, think about some of the buildings in your city that have won awards for their “innovative” designs, but are practically a nuisance. That’s not to say that there isn’t a place for impressive and artistic, beautiful, and sometimes even perplexing buildings in our cities, but they must be the exceptions, not the rule.

http://www.ted.com/talks/timothy_prestero_design_for_people_not_awards.html

Pastry Walk! (Happy Two Month-iversary!)

We celebrated two months of blogging on noodles and new urbanism.

After nearly a year of monthly meetups talking, and two months blogging, we decided to put on an event: a pastry walk!

Actually, it wasn’t our idea.  We’re copying it from walk-bike Glendale.

We’re gonna contact our local bakeries and draw a map and some fliers.  Hopefully you will come out and enjoy a walk through the neighborhood and delicious pastries.

If you want to help us, email info@noodlesandnewurbanism.org

That’s right, for our two month-iversary we bought the domain!

The year of women. What we can do.

Again, the blog is taking a political theme.  Both parties are courting the “women vote” by taking (somewhat) stances on birth control and abortion.  I feel like these issues will never be resolved satisfactorily by the government.  But the government can take action on areas where there are responsible: transit.

Making public transit safer for women.  This is something government can and should be doing.

Here is a great article about the issue, with real testimonials, and some real solutions. Take a read!

http://laist.com/2012/09/08/one_womans_tale_of_harassment_on_th.php

Put your road on a diet!

I recently started riding my bike a lot more.  Mainly due to the fact that I recently bought my bike.

It is weird when a car-person sees me unlocking my ride to pedal off into the sunset.  They try to relate: they would ride a bicycle, but it is so unsafe.

UNSAFE!  Not that it is too hard, unpleasant, too sweaty, takes too long. Etc. etc.  The primary obstacle for car-people to become people-people is safety. We need to build a better town that makes us feel okay about riding our bikes.

For far too long we have designed roads for cars. (As opposed to designing them for people.) When people WANT to walk, jog, or pedal about, they cannot  …For fear for their very lives!   We’ve built eight lane streets that are impossible to cross as a pedestrian.  We prize high speed traffic which make it unfriendly to bicyclists and pedestrians and even other cars, really.  For example, “anti-grid lock” zones even discriminate amongst cars, favoring cars that aren’t even going to or coming from our neighborhood.  The whole traffic system is fat. And it’s making us fat.  Our infrastructure has gotten fat.  It’s time for us to go on a diet, a road diet.

Here’s a visual of a road diet petitioned for in Glendale:

Road diets make driving, walking and bicycling more pleasant. And what’s more pleasing than safety?

This benefits cars so much.  In fact, I came up with the idea while driving my car. Heading west on 3rd street it looks like the above photo.  Two lanes.  Should be more efficient, right?  Wrong.  Very frequently both lanes jam up because a driver in the left lane want to make a left turn but has to wait for auto-traffic or pedestrians and another driver in the right lane wants to make a right turn but has to wait for pedestrians.

With a dedicated turn lane for cars going both ways, left turners get the advantage and can wait patiently for a natural break in traffic.  And with a consistent parking lane, ending 15 feet to the corner, cars turning right can slow, merge across bicycle lane and wait patiently in the parking lane before making a right hand turn.

Here is a report on an investigation by the federal DOT to see if road diets actually reduce the number of crashes on the road.

Spoiler Alert: Yes.  (But you can still read it if you want to.)

http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/humanfac/04082/index.cfm

Not only is it safer, aesthetically pleasing, and more efficient for all involved, it is also good for business.

Despite all these checks in the pros column, national funding for bike lanes has been lumped in with Safe Routes to Schools and funding for recreation.  Not only have they been combined, but drastically reduced.

Which makes me want to talk politics for a quick second even though I know you’re annoyed by all your friends posting about politics during the campaign season.  But this is the kind of politics I WISH we could talk about instead of the “politics” of what is going on with a women’s lady parts.

Call me a “doomer,” but in our future we might be riding bicycles out of necessity rather than just for enjoyment.  If we make these changes now, we’ll be a lot safer regardless of the state of our national economy.

Wheew, politics got a hold of me for a bit.  In the end riding a bike is not about politics, it’s about fun.